Friday, March 29, 2019

US Govt Bonds have a 0% Chance of Default

Not I say one, but former Fed Chair Alan Greenspan say one hor.

If you need more money, just print more money lor, easy what.

Thursday, March 28, 2019

DGD holders all just had a collective brainwave

The reddit thread in question is here.

Here's the tl;dr cos I know y'all lazy:
- OP is a DGD whale since ICO
- OP has market made DGX at losses
- Digix team too humji to take risks
- a lot of holders want to call it quits
- a lot of holders want to be able to withdraw ETH from the DAO

Guess what?

Not going to get approved. You don't have to look too far to find out how concentrated ownership is.

Y'all lazy so more math from me:
51% is held by the top 10 addresses.
67% is held by the top 28 addresses.

Interestingly, in other words, the top 10 addresses own $19M of tokens, and the top 28 addresses own $25M of tokens. That's a lot of money for virtual digital tulips, ain't it?

Anyway, oh my, who could've seen this happening from September last year?

When I was very active in the DGD community in late 2017 and early 2018, one of the things I've noticed by the other holders is that (1) they are all uneducated in financial engineering and (2) they were EXTREMELY resistant on making any of the ETH in the DAO redeemable.

They must be recently getting smarter since they realize that the ETH idling in the DAO is extremely capital inefficient (to address 1) and this post to make ETH redeemable (to address 2).

I'd say, too little, too late.

Even if ETH was redeemable, whoopdeedoo, most people will still be realizing losses by redeeming and exiting.

And if its not redeemable, what's the prospect? DGX gaining mass adoption and start raking in fees, and then DGD moons? LOL.

I'm glad I've exited my position. Holders of DGD are either too stunned to take action and bite the bullet to eat the loss, or too damn stupid to realize what is happening in front of their very eyes.

Hope, is not an investment strategy.

Can't Get Caught Without Any Evidence

Interesting news piece.

You know, governments REALLY hate it when you move money around which you didn't pre-apply for approval? Hehe.

There's both an exhilarating sense of freedom and fear when you own cryptocurrencies.

Exhilarating freedom that you can just up and go anywhere and disappear with all your networth.
Exhilarating fear that 1 missed character or 1 misstep gets all your crypto stolen or destroyed.

You know who should be knowing how much, when and to whom I'm sending money to? Or receiving money from?

Mr. NoneOfYourFuckingBusiness

For countries with extreme capital control measures and forced their citizens into holding their hyper-inflating national currency, cryptocurrencies are the only way out. Not silver, not gold. Not anything physical or seizable.

Generations before us, someone smart realized that there SHOULD be separation of state and religion. I personally think that it was a pretty good idea and turned out pretty well.

The next radical change that I'll see in my lifetime is the separation of state and money.

It's not even opinion anymore - it is fact that there has been countless of failed attempts by governments at properly managing fiat money. Sure it could last a few decades or so, but it always ends up the same way.

What you do with this information, is up to you.

Monday, March 25, 2019

Singapore Yield Curve How Ar?

Come, today Brother G make you smart.

1. Go to here:

2. SGS Prices and Yields - Benchmark Issues

3. 2018 > Nov > 2019 > Mar > Daily

4. Click "Display"


Interesting dates:

29 Nov 2018
1Y = 2.04%
2Y = 2.02%
5Y = 2.17%
10Y = 2.40%

31 Dec 2018
1Y = 2.04%
2Y = 1.88%
5Y = 1.90%
10Y = 2.04%

25 Mar 2019 (Today)
1Y = 1.99%
2Y = 1.90%
5Y = 1.92%
10Y = 2.04%

Does anyone know what this means?

I try to explain it to you.

Today, if you lend the gahmen money for 1 year, you will get 1.99% APR
Today, if you lend the gahmen money for 10 year, you will get 2.04% APR


So funny hor. You lend them for 9 extra years, you only get extra 0.05%.

Let's see another one.

Today, if you lend the gahmen money for 1 year, you will get 1.99% APR
Today, if you lend the gahmen money for 5 year, you will get 1.92% APR


You lend the government for extra 4 years, you get LESS returns?

Wa, so funny.

Nevermind guys, I heard yield curve inversions don't mean anything.

Plus, if everyone THINKS that it's a bearish sign, it means the correct contrarian move is to go long, right?

Sunday, March 24, 2019

Dat Inverted Yield Curve

Presented without comment.

Tuesday, March 12, 2019

Hyflux Horrors in 2019

Y'all know, I generally don't poke my nose into other people's shit.

But Hyflux is one of those stinking shits that smell so terrible, it's hard to ignore.

So I heard from Bloomberg today that investor's might lose up to 90%?

I think the better report is actually by CNA which works out the min/max that can be recovered, which is between 5-15%.

People can discuss and argue all they want: about what they think the government should bail out, why it should be bailed out, how it's a small sum to bail them out, how NOT bailing out will "shake investor's confidence" and we can all argue until the cows come home. I highly doubt it'll change a damn thing.

I've said it before, I don't think the government will bail out Hyflux, and I don't think they should.

It was a bad investment into a bad company, that's what it is.

... If you're not vested, I would implore you to find some good reasons to get yourself involved in this mess. I can't find any, other than a 6% yield, which is meaningless if you only get paid for a few years and lose the principal.

To me, it's a no no. I'm staying away and I'm just going to watch this show.

Will this subscription yet again becomes oversubscribed by the retail horde? I'm counting on you, aunties and uncles. - GMGH, May 2016

Did you know that there is a Hyflux telegram group? And by my eyeballing, it is indeed truly filled with many aunites and uncles. It's rough being a retail bagholder. I salute all those people trying to "fight" for something. Shoutout to Sgdividends who has been following the whole case very closely.

But honestly, the prospects of a "good" outcome is very weak, IMO.

They took a risk and a gamble and they lost, that's pretty much it.

While I might sound like I'm being a heartless bitch about things, the sooner you learn that in finances that your emotions and feelings count for diddly shit, the sooner you can cut through the bullshit.

The moral of the story is: If you're downside protection strategy involves the government bailing you out, it's PROBABLY not a good strategy.

Tuesday, March 5, 2019

Crypto Markets Thoughts Mar 2019

For the people following my tweets and retweets on Twitter, I doubt you'd gain much from this post. Perhaps just a more organized and presentable format than Twitter which is a very haphazard medium.

Recently, the biggest discovery for me was the Uniswap AMM model. Basically its an algorithmic automated market maker. It's is very interesting for several reasons. First off, it's rent-free. This means that the developers make absolutely nothing from its success. They managed to build it because they were given a grant by the Ethereum foundation. Basically, they created a token-less, rent-free model of Bancor. The grant they received was $50k. Guess how much Bancor raised in their ICO? $153M.

Let me do the math for you. Bancor has a budget 3000X larger than the Uniswap team. And guess what? Uniswap does ~70% of the volume that Bancor does. And Bancor has been around for a pretty long time, while Uniswap launched a little over 3 months ago. The growth has been astonishing.

The next interesting thing is how Uniswap basically works as a nominated money changer that is open 24/7.

Anyone (including you) can basically "fund" the money changer by giving him capital, and he perpetually quote rates and fills exchange requests. Every single time the money changer completes a trade, he helps you take a 0.3% cut, and FOR FREE. Remember, this is a public good, rent-free model.

There is no token.
There is no profits going to external parties.
All profits goes back to the people who have put in liquidity.

Basically, you provide liquidity and you get paid whenever people utilize your liquidity. Simple, ain't it?

It's an extremely interesting MARKET NEUTRAL strategy, which there are very very very few in existence, even in traditional markets.

Anyway, explaining the algorithm of AMM is a bit complex, but essentially as long as you were already going to simply hold your crypto assets, you stand almost no risk by contributing liquidity, while you can enjoy the upside of skimming 0.3% of every trade that occurs by Mister Money Changer (Uniswap).

The perpetual 24/7 nature of Uniswap brings me to believe that in the future, projects will raise funds and upfront announce the intention to allocate funds to create and start a Uniswap liquidity pool, alongside the traditional strategy of listing on "regular" exchanges.

People are just starting to understand the importance of liquidity. I can never stress how important liquidity and market depth is.

The last point about AMMs (you will need technical knowledge to understand this bit), is that they basically provide a native, on-chain price oracle, kept accurate by funding arbitragers with arbitrage profits. This actually means that it *can* be used as a price feed, though it's probably not a fantastic one. Still, very interesting.

Uniswap and AMMs aside, the next interesting thing for me is regarding the #DeFi movement, which is short for decentralized finance, aka "Open Finance".

Being heavily interested (and invested) into DeFi related projects has kept me on the toes regarding the development of this space.

One of the most interesting aspects that I am enjoying about it so far is the flourishing of multiple avenues to "work" your otherwise idle crypto-assets, and these are mostly through fully collateralized lending.

The range of options vary with risks, the main one being custodial risks. But it is possible to earn anywhere between 3-7% on your crypto assets by "lending" it out.

As I said before, each avenue has different risks. In some, the risk that you assume is catastrophic - the 3rd party absconds with your crypto and you never see anything back. In others, the risk has been reduced to smart contract execution / bug risks - which means that you technically never give up your crypto to a 3rd party. It's yours, but you just can't use it, but you can get it back anytime and no one can stop you. More confusing than it sounds, but it's mindblowing.

It means that anyone can just throw in ETH / tokens into these smart contracts, and whenever they feel like it, they can withdraw with some returns. It's like a perpetual rolling fixed deposit. Or maybe a money market fund. With no questions asked, no KYC/AML needed, processes deposits in 15 seconds, processes withdraws in 15 seconds. It's a super crypto savings accounts with mad interest, that's basically what it is. If this ain't an interesting way to store money, I don't know what is.

For someone like me that is heavily invested in crypto, having my crypto "work" for me instead of sitting idly in my wallets is a godsend. I've been evaluating and trying out a lot of options lately, but I have to say that I am very impressed at how the space is developing and I think it's entirely possible that in the near future you can just lock up ETH without staking in the POS model and still get paid fat chunks of interest.

Interestingly enough, this has also led me to the realization that BTC is a lot more "limited" and constrained than I had initially thought. The limitations of BTC script language means that all the complex smart contract interactions going on in the ETH DeFi space is... impossible to do on BTC without the use of sidechains / another chain or trusted 3rd parties.

There is no such thing as trustless BTC lending (yet).

Basically, outside of payments and a store of value, BTC has limited itself from expanded and extended functionalities.

And once you realize that, you also start to figure out that BTC's Lightning Network dream is also at risk of ever truly becoming reality because of this. It has recently surfaced the amount of issues that the LN has in its current stage, but of course work is being done to improve it.

Yet on the ETH side of things, there's literally 20+ projects and teams working on different scaling solutions which are almost all independent of each other.

Let me rephrase this whole thing:

One problem of crypto is scaling up.

BTC's solution is the LN, and they have a few teams working on different implementations of the same thing.

ETH's solution is SEVERAL solutions, and some solutions have several teams working on different implementations, but ANY solution would scale up ETH, though different solutions have different impacts of scaling benefits.

So BTC has 4 teams trying out 1 way to solve a problem. ETH has many teams, trying out several ways to solve the same problem.

Don't get me wrong, I love BTC and what it represents. But practically, can BTC ever scale up with LN to be the kind of digital money that people would use in the future?

I'm rather meh on that prospects. I still have BTC, but I am extremely more overweight on ETH.

Anyway peeps, this is just the ramblings of a crypto observer. I'm sure that this is just technical bullshit mumbo jumbo for the majority of you, but hopefully it's a refreshing take for some of you, especially those that are not on Twitter.

Not many people dare to be "anti-BTC", but at least I come prepared with reasoning for my stance. The market will let us know who is right in the future.